TY - STD TI - Albrecht V, Vaněček J (2008) Assessment of participation of the Czech Republic in the EU framework programmes. Technology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic ID - ref1 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Arnold, E. PY - 2004 DA - 2004// TI - Evaluating research and innovation policy: a systems world needs systems evaluations JO - Res Eval VL - 13(1) UR - https://doi.org/10.3152/147154404781776509 DO - 10.3152/147154404781776509 ID - Arnold2004 ER - TY - STD TI - Arnold E (2009) How meta-evaluation helps us understand the effects of the framework programmes. Presentation at the EUFORDIA Conference, Prague, 25 February 2009 ID - ref3 ER - TY - STD TI - Arnold E, Guy K (1997) Technology diffusion programmes and the challenge for evaluation. In: OECD conference on policy evaluation in innovation and technology, chapter 6. Paris ID - ref4 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Chelimsky, E. PY - 1995 DA - 1995// TI - Where we stand today in the practice of evaluation: some reflections JO - Knowledge & Policy VL - 8 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02904927 DO - 10.1007/BF02904927 ID - Chelimsky1995 ER - TY - STD TI - Durieux L, Fayl G (1997) The scheme used for evaluating the European research and technological development programmes. In: OECD (1997a). Policy evaluation in innovation and technology: towards best practices ID - ref6 ER - TY - STD TI - Expert Group (2009) Evaluation of the sixth framework programmes for research and technological development 2002–2006. Report of the Expert Group. Chairman: E. Th. Rietschel, Rapporteur: E. Arnold ID - ref7 ER - TY - STD TI - Fahrenkrog G, Polt W, Rojo J, Tubke A, Zinocker K (eds) (2002) RTD evaluation toolbox: assessing the socio-economic impact of RTD policies ID - ref8 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Georghiou, L. PY - 2007 DA - 2007// TI - Avoiding the risk of under-evaluation JO - Science and Public Policy VL - 34 UR - https://doi.org/10.3152/030234207X259003 DO - 10.3152/030234207X259003 ID - Georghiou2007 ER - TY - STD TI - Georghiou L, Polt W (2004) EU evaluation practice. INTEREG Research Report Series. Institute of Technology and Regional Policy ID - ref10 ER - TY - STD TI - IEG (2007) Sourcebook for evaluating global and regional partnership programs. Indicative principles and standards ID - ref11 ER - TY - STD TI - Kalenoja H, Mäntynen J, Pöllänen M (2004) Evaluation of JALOIN programme and suggested measures for promoting pedestrian and bicycle traffic in Finland. Publications of the Ministry of Transport and Communications 40/2004, 98 p ID - ref12 ER - TY - STD TI - Kuitunen S, Hyytinen K (2004) Julkisten tutkimuslaitosten vaikutusten arviointi. Käytäntöjä, kokemuksia ja haasteita. VTT Tiedotteita 2230. Espoo: VTT. [Impact evaluation of public research organisations. Practices, experiences and challenges.] (Only in Finnish.) http://virtual.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/2004/T2230.pdf UR - http://virtual.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/2004/T2230.pdf ID - ref13 ER - TY - STD TI - Kuhlmann S (2009) Lessons from and for research policy impact evaluation. Presentation at the EUFORDIA Conference, Prague, 24–25 February 2009 ID - ref14 ER - TY - CHAP AU - Kuhlmann, S. ED - Shapira, P. h. ED - Kuhlmann, S. PY - 2003 DA - 2003// TI - Evaluation as a source of “Strategic Intelligence” BT - Learning from science and technology policy evaluation: experiences from the United States and Europe PB - E. Elgar CY - Cheltenham ID - Kuhlmann2003 ER - TY - STD TI - LEG Expert Group for the follow-up of the research aspects of the revised Lisbon strategy (2008) The governance challenge for knowledge policies in the Lisbon Strategy: between revolution and illusion. Final Synthesis Report, 18 June 2008 ID - ref16 ER - TY - STD TI - LEG Expert Group for the follow up of the research aspects of the Lisbon strategy (2009) The open method of coordination in research policy: assessment and recommendations. European Commission Directorate-General for Research, Directorate C-European research area: knowledge based economy, Unit C.3—Economic analysis and monitoring of national research policies and the Lisbon strategy. January 2009 ID - ref17 ER - TY - STD TI - Leonard JD, Washington S, Williams B, Manning DG, Roberts C, Baccus AR, Devanhalli A, Ogle J, Melcher D (2003) Scientific approaches to transportation research. NCHRP 20–45 Report. Georgia Institute of Technology ID - ref18 ER - TY - STD TI - Lähteenmäki-Smith K, Hyytinen K, Kutinlahti P, Konttinen J (2006) Research with an impact. Evaluation practises in public research organisations. VTT Research Notes 2336. Espoo 2006 ID - ref19 ER - TY - STD TI - Merkx F, van der Weijden I, Oostveen A-M, Spaapen J (2007) Evaluation of research in context. A quick scan of an emerging field (www.eric-project.nl) UR - http://www.eric-project.nl ID - ref20 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Mickwitz, P. PY - 2003 DA - 2003// TI - A framework for evaluating environmental policy instruments—context and key concepts JO - Evaluation VL - 9 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389003094004 DO - 10.1177/1356389003094004 ID - Mickwitz2003 ER - TY - STD TI - Nagarajan N, Vanheukelen M (1997) Evaluating EU expenditure programmes: a guide to intermediate and ex post evaluation. XIX/02—Budgetary overview and evaluation. DG XIX, European Commission ID - ref22 ER - TY - STD TI - OECD (1999) Improving evaluation practices. Best practice guidelines for evaluation background paper. PUMA/PAC (99)1. 45 p ID - ref23 ER - TY - STD TI - OECD (1997) Policy evaluation in innovation and technology: towards best practices ID - ref24 ER - TY - STD TI - Pihlajamaa J, Berg P (2008) Understanding the client at Finnra: ASTAR research programme final assessment report. Helsinki 2008. Finnish Road Administration, Central Administration, Finnra reports 1/2008. 32 p. + app. 11 pp 998–6 ID - ref25 ER - TY - BOOK AU - Scriven, M. PY - 1991 DA - 1991// TI - Evaluation thesaurus PB - Sage Publications CY - Newbury Park ID - Scriven1991 ER - TY - CHAP AU - Sheatsley, P. ED - Rossi, P. ED - Wright, J. ED - Anderson, A. PY - 1983 DA - 1983// TI - Questionnaire construction and item writing BT - Handbook of survey research PB - Academic CY - New York UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-598226-9.50012-4 DO - 10.1016/B978-0-12-598226-9.50012-4 ID - Sheatsley1983 ER - TY - CHAP AU - Sudman, S. ED - Rossi, P. ED - Wright, J. ED - Anderson, A. PY - 1983 DA - 1983// TI - Applied sampling BT - Handbook of survey research PB - Academic CY - New York UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-598226-9.50011-2 DO - 10.1016/B978-0-12-598226-9.50011-2 ID - Sudman1983 ER - TY - STD TI - Tassey G (2003) Methods for assessing the economic impacts of government R&D. Planning report 03–1. National institute of Standards & Technology, NIST ID - ref29 ER - TY - STD TI - López-Lambas M, López-Suárez E, La Paix Puello L, Binsted A, Tuominen A, Järvi T (2009) METRONOME D4.1 Sustainable development methodology development and application results. European Commission, FP7 ID - ref30 ER - TY - STD TI - Mitsakis E, Tyrinopoulos Y, Binsted A (2009) METRONOME D3.1 Industrial competitiveness methodology development and application results. European Commission, FP7 ID - ref31 ER - TY - STD TI - Sitov A, van der Waard J, Flikkema H, Binsted A, Ferris C, Tuominen A (2009) METRONOME D5.1 Methodology for evaluation of FP5 and FP6 project impacts on community and public policies. European Commission, FP7 ID - ref32 ER - TY - STD TI - Tuominen A, Järvi T, Hyytinen K, Pesonen A, van der Waard J, Mitsakis E, Sito A, Binsted A, López-Lambas M, López-Suárez E, La Paix-Puello L (2009) METRONOME final deliverable. METRONOME methodology for evaluation of research project impacts in the filed of transport. European Commission, FP7 ID - ref33 ER -