An Open Access Journal
Table 5 Ranking of objectives of policies for sustainable urban mobility (PSUM) and selection of performance indicators according to stakeholders’ appraisal. Threshold: score = 2.85
Objectives of PSUM | Weighted average scorea | Ranking | Performance indicators of PSUM |
|---|---|---|---|
Selected performance indicators of PSUM: | |||
Easing non-motorized mobility | 4.00 | 1° | Walkability and “cyclabilty” |
Easing public transport | 4.00 | 1° | Quantity and quality of public transport |
Reducing land consumption generated by mobility | 3.63 | 3° | Land occupied by transport infrastructure |
Reducing public space occupied by motorized vehicles | 3.05 | 4° | Vehicles- and vehicles*km per km2 |
Increasing transport safety | 2.89 | 5° | Deaths and injuries from traffic accidents |
Reducing air pollutants generated by mobility | 2.88 | 6° | Main air pollutants from transport: PMx, COVNM, Nox, CO |
Reducing greenhouse-gasses generated by mobility | 2.88 | 6° | CO2 from transport |
Increasing the alternatives to mobility | 2.87 | 8° | Public and private services accessible via telephone and computer |
Non selected performance indicators of PSUM: | |||
Reducing noise generated by mobility | 2.14 | 9° | % of population exposed to harmful noise |
Reducing waste generated by mobility | 2.12 | 10° | Waste from transport |
Easing private motorized mobility | 1.26 | 11° | Congestion |
Reducing public transport costs | 0.62 | 12° | Households expenditures for public transport |
Reducing private transport costs | 0.62 | 12° | Households expenditures for private transport |