An Open Access Journal
Table 2 Statistic analysis of route data used for the simulation of hybrid railcar performance
From: Investigating an all-hydraulic hybrid system for diesel-hydraulic rail cars
Line Number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Route length | km | 52,4 | 61,9 | 54,5 | 47,6 | 20,7 | 68,0 | 90,4 | 81,4 |
Average distance between two stops | km | 8,7 | 6,9 | 10,7 | 9,5 | 3,5 | 6,2 | 5,6 | 4,0 |
Standard deviation of distances between two stops | km | 3,6 | 3,0 | 4,8 | 2,9 | 0,6 | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,0 |
Average longitudinal gradient | ‰ | 0,1 | 0,0 | 3,1 | 3,2 | 3,6 | 0,7 | 0,2 | 2,4 |
Share of downhill line sections (with respect to route length) | % | 23,7 | 18,4 | 10,7 | 10,0 | 16,0 | 47,5 | 37,6 | 21,4 |
Share of flat line sections (with respect to route length) | % | 51,6 | 66,9 | 27,3 | 34,0 | 17,9 | 13,4 | 22,7 | 31,4 |
Share of uphill line sections (with respect to route length) | % | 24,7 | 14,7 | 62,0 | 56,0 | 66,1 | 39,1 | 39,7 | 47,2 |
Average allowable line speed | km/h | 98 | 114 | 112 | 95 | 69 | 97 | 118 | 118 |