Skip to main content

An Open Access Journal

Table 2 Summary of evaluation results for treatments on road sections: efficiency indices and their 95 % confidence intervals

From: The evaluation of safety efficiency of non-urban infrastructure improvements; a case-study

Type of infrastructure improvement (#)

Injury accidents

Severe accidents

Total accidents

Upgrading a single-carriageway to a dual-carriageway road section (2)

−32 % [−48 %; −11 %]

Reduction trend, ns

−31 % [−41 %; −19 %]

Building a median on a road section crossing an urban area (2)

No change

--

−53 % [−66 %; −37 %]

Barrier installation - building a rigid median, on a single-carriageway road (4)

−50 % [−68 %; −24 %]

Reduction trend, ns

−23 % [−40 %; −2 %]

A combined treatment: barriers, road marking/signing, on a single-carriageway road (4)

Increasing trend, ns

--

−13 % [−27 %; +3 %]*

A combined treatment: barriers, road marking/signing, on a dual-carriageway road (3)

No change

No change

−14 % [−22 %; −6 %]

A combined treatment: resurfacing, road marking, barriers' treatment, on a single-carriageway road (6)

−16 % [−29 %; −1 %]

No change

−20 % [−28 %; −11 %]

A combined treatment: resurfacing, road marking, barriers' treatment, on a dual-carriageway road (6)

−23 % [−30 %; −16 %]

No change

No change

A combined treatment: barriers, resurfacing, shoulders, on a single-carriageway road (5)

−12 % [−23 %; −0 %]

Increasing trend, ns

−19 % [−25 %; −13 %]

A combined treatment: signs, pavement, shoulders, on a single-carriageway road (1)

Reduction trend, ns

Reduction trend, ns

Reduction trend, ns

A combined treatment: resurfacing, crash cushions' installation, barriers' treatment, on a dual-carriageway road (1)

No change

No change

−17 % [−24 %; −11 %]

Pavement treatments, including road marking, raised markers, on a single-carriageway road (1)

No change

Reduction trend, ns

−23 % [−38 %; −5 %]

  1. Notes to Table 2: # number of sites treated; 35 road sections in total. The numerical results presented are significant at 0.05 confidence level; * significant at 0.1 level; ns - not significant
  2. "--" means no result (insufficient data); "no change" indicates that average value of the efficiency index is below 5 %