An Open Access Journal
Table 3 Spearman rank correlation across indicators applying the DEA approach
Scenario 45 | 45 | - LA | - NA | - PA | - PDA |
- LA | 0.977 | - | |||
- NA | 0.993 | 0.974 | - | ||
- PA | 0.826 | 0.808 | 0.805 | - | |
- PDA | 0.996 | 0.972 | 0.994 | 0.802 | - |
Baseline 2005 | 2005 | - LA | - NA | - PA | - PDA |
- LA | 1.000 | - | |||
- NA | 1.000 | 1.000 | - | ||
- PA | 0.847 | 0.847 | 0.847 | - | |
- PDA | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.840 | - |
Scenario 90 | 2005 | - LA | - NA | - PA | - PDA |
- LA | 1.000 | - | |||
- NA | 0.973 | 0.973 | - | ||
- PA | 0.856 | 0.856 | 0.819 | - | |
- PDA | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.974 | 0.849 | - |
Scenario 200 | 200 | - LA | - NA | - PA | - PDA |
- LA | 0.998 | - | |||
- NA | 1.000 | 0.998 | - | ||
- PA | 0.998 | 0.996 | 0.998 | - | |
- PDA | 0.925 | 0.922 | 0.925 | 0.918 | - |