Skip to main content

An Open Access Journal

Table 2 Critical and follow-up headways values for double-lane roundabouts

From: Gap-accepteance parameters for roundabouts: a systematic review

study name

country

estimation method applied

entry lane

critical headway

follow-up headway

mean [s]

st. deviation [s]

mean [s]

st. deviation [s]

min

max

min

max

min

max

min

max

Dahl & Lee [75]

Canada

R.M., P.E.

 

3.50

6.10

-

-

1.60

5.00

-

-

De Luca et al. [52]

Italy

n.a.

 

3.22

-

0.80

-

-

-

-

-

Fortuijn [44]

The Netherlands

n.a.

left

2.89

3.16

0.04

1.32

2.24

2.26

-

-

Gazzarri et al. [45]

Italy

M.L.M.

left

3.59

4.42

0.64

1.14

2.16

3.10

0.49

0.95

   

right

3.19

4.33

0.61

1.08

2.44

2.91

0.58

0.76

Greibe & La Cour Lund [43]

Denmark

K.M.

left

3.90

4.10

-

-

2.60

-

-

-

   

right

3.90

4.20

-

-

2.70

-

-

-

Guo [77]

China

R.M., M.L.M., R.R.M., A.M.

 

2.62

3.20

-

-

-

-

-

-

Hagring et al. [42]

Denmark

M.L.M.

left

4.36

4.68

1.10

1.82

2.79

-

0.87

-

   

right

3.68

4.49

1.20

1.68

2.89

-

1.03

-

Leemann & Santel [40]

Switzerland

M.L.M.

 

3.22

4.33

-

-

2.27

2.63

-

-

Li et al. [71]

US

M.L.M.

left

4.30

-

1.00

-

3.10

-

1.20

-

Manage et al. (2003) [79]

Japan

n.a.

 

3.26

4.90

-

-

-

-

-

-

Nicolosi et al. [49]

Italy

M.L.M., E.R.M.

 

1.87

2.94

0.35

1.01

1.87

2.50

0.42

0.55

Qu Z et al. [76]

China

M.L.M., R.M

left

4.57

4.85

-

-

-

-

-

-

   

right

4.41

4.58

-

-

-

-

-

-

Rodegerdts et al. [61]

US

M.L.M.

left

3.70

5.50

0.70

2.60

2.90

5.00

1.00

3.90

   

right

3.20

4.90

1.00

3.80

2.80

4.40

0.80

2.30

Romano [48]

Italy

n.a.

 

2.03

3.69

0.24

1.45

-

-

-

-

Vasconcelos et al. [55]

Portugal

S.M., R.M., M.L.M., W.M., L.M.

 

2.56

4.46

-

-

1.94

2.78

-

-

Wu [37]

Germany

n.a.

 

4.12

-

-

-

-

2.88

-

-

Xu & Tian [72]

US

M.L.M.

left

4.40

5.10

0.90

1.10

1.80

2.70

0.60

0.90

   

right

4.00

4.80

0.90

1.10

2.10

2.30

0.70

1.00

Zheng et al. [17]

US

M.L.M.

left

3.30

4.80

0.60

1.40

2.10

3.10

0.70

1.40

   

right

3.00

4.40

0.60

1.50

2.20

3.00

0.50

1.20

  1. Note: R.M = Raffs method [47]; P.E. = Probability Equilibrium method; M.L.M. = Maximum Likelihood Method; M.M. = Median Method; S.M. = Sieglochs Method [51]; L.M. = Logit Model; W.M. = Wus Model [37]; K.M.= \( K\ddot{a} rbes \) Model as referred by [43]; A.M. = Ashworths method [78]; n.a. = not available