Skip to main content

An Open Access Journal

Table 2 Accessibility measures used in this study and their definition

From: Accessibility and territorial cohesion in a case of transport infrastructure improvements with changing population distributions

Indicator

Definition

Remarks

Location access

\( {L}_i={\displaystyle \sum_{j=1}^n{c}_{ij}{P}_j{S}_j}/{\displaystyle \sum_{j=1}^n{P}_j{S}_j} \)

\( {S}_j=\left\{\begin{array}{c}\hfill 1\; if\kern0.1em j\; is\; in\;a\; capital\; or\; large\; city\hfill \\ {}\hfill 0\; if\; not\hfill \end{array}\right. \)

For this study only national capitals, DĆ¼sseldorf, Hamburg and Munich are selected through S.

Network efficiency

\( {E}_i={\displaystyle \sum_{j=1}^n\frac{c_{ij}}{{\acute{c}}_{ij}}}/{\displaystyle \sum_{j=1}^n{P}_j} \)

Ideal traveltimes \( {\overset{\acute{\mkern6mu}}{c}}_{ij} \) are based on Euclidean distances between i and j and the fastest maximum speed (130Ā km/h) recorded in the road network data

Potential accessibility

\( Po{t}_i={\displaystyle \sum_{j=1}^n{P}_jf\left({c}_{ij}\right)} \)

f(c ij )ā€‰=ā€‰c ij -1.5

Daily accessibility

\( {D}_i={\displaystyle \sum_{j=1}^n{P}_j}{\overset{\wedge }{c}}_{ij} \)

\( {\widehat{c}}_{ij}=\left\{\begin{array}{c}1\ \mathrm{if}\ {c}_{ij}\le 240 \min .\\ {}0\ \mathrm{if}\ {c}_{ij}>240 \min .\end{array}\right. \)