Skip to main content

Table 2 Normality test of FEA decision variables

From: Analyzing the moderating effects of respondent type and experience on the fuel efficiency improvement in air transport using structural equation modeling

Decision variables

Skewness

Kurtosis

Std. Deviation

AFP1

.316

−.364

.831

AFP2

.122

−.782

.893

AFP3

.318

−.445

.885

AFP4

−.265

−.725

.927

AFP5

−.058

−.879

.946

AFP6

−.093

−.923

.955

AFP7

.069

−.637

.897

SEP1

−.699

1.019

.704

SEP2

−.724

1.374

.703

SEP3

−.590

.978

.705

SEP4

−.597

1.232

.682

SEP5

−.592

.963

.701

SEP6

−.605

1.097

.662

SEP7

−.374

−.006

.687

AI1

−.406

−.215

.927

AI2

−.456

−.182

.930

AI3

−.630

.267

.909

AI4

−1.000

1.331

.829

AI5

−.283

−.441

.956

AI6

−.665

.336

.859

AI7

−.773

.698

.861

ATD1

−.893

1.901

.670

ATD2

−.660

1.243

.650

ATD3

−.325

1.946

.549

ATD4

−.567

1.328

.631

AO1

−.739

1.048

.761

AO2

−.897

1.967

.723

AO3

−.614

1.028

.733

AO4

−.729

1.021

.762

AO5

−.690

1.124

.713

AO6

−.748

.711

.811

AO7

−.511

.728

.740

AO8

−.047

−.465

.901