Skip to main content

An Open Access Journal

Table 4 An assessment of the six countries against the Advisory Group’s recommendations

From: Appropriate national policy frameworks for sustainable urban mobility plans

 

Criterion

England

France

Germany

Romania

Spain

The Netherlands

1a

National framework

Partial

Yes

Partial

Partial

Partial

Yes

1b

Consistency over time

No

Partial

Yes

No

No

Yes

2a

National coordination

No

Partial

No

No

Partial

No

2b

Vertical coordination

Partial

Yes

Yes

No

Partial

Yes

3a

Decentralisation

Partial

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

3b

Local coordination

Partial

Partial

Partial

No

Partial

Partial

3c

National audit

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

4a

Guidance on SUMPs

Partial

Yes

Partial

Partial

Yes

No

4b

Skill development

No

Yes

Partial

No

Yes

Yes

5a

Participatory framework

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Partial

Yes

5b

Political support

Partial

Yes

Partial

No

Partial

Yes

6a

Legal, regulatory framework

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

6b

Coherence of framework

Yes

Partial

Partial

n/a

Partial

Yes

6c

Enforceability

Partial

Partial

Partial

n/a

Partial

Partial

7a

Comprehensive pricing

No

No

No

No

No

No

7b

Appropriate signals to users

No

Partial

Partial

No

No

Partial

8a

Coherent financing

No

No

No

No

No

No

8b

Avoiding infrastructure bias

No

Partial

No

No

No

Yes

9a

Support for monitoring

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

9b

Support for research

No

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes