An Open Access Journal
Table 1 Comparison of different approaches to UFT policy-making and added value of the proposed integrated framework
Approach | Problem addressed | Outcome | Effort | Potential of success | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Desk | Incomplete understanding of UFT problems and solutions | Deep well-grounded context-embedded knowledge | + | + |
2 | Living laboratories | Scant coordination between stakeholders and different planning sectors | Collaborative and integrated planning | ++ | ++ |
3 | Modelling | Lack of ex-ante policy evaluation and scant information/understanding of behavioural issues | Evaluation by using different methods and performing sophisticated analyses | ++ | ++ |
4 | (1) + (2) + (3) | Identifying an optimised policy package and supporting the deployment of cost-effective UFT solutions | Bringing together knowledge acquisition, policy co-creation, technical and behaviour change analysis | +++ | +++ |