An Open Access Journal
From: Plan for sustainable urban logistics – comparing between Scandinavian and UK practices
Malmö | Stockholm | Aalborg, Århus, Odense, Copenhagen, Kolding | Bergen | Bedford | West Berkshire | Aberdeen | Dundee | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Infrastructure management | New and upgraded terminals (ports and road) | X | X | ||||||
New and upgraded infrastructure for urban freight | X | X | |||||||
Road safety | X | X | X | ||||||
Potential for other freight modes – rail, pipeline, waterborne and airborne freight | |||||||||
Parking /loading areas management | Upgrade and improve parking areas and loading zones | X | X | X | X | X | |||
Vehicle rest facilities | X | ||||||||
Vehicle-related strategies | Cycle logistics | X | |||||||
Low and zero-emission vehicles | X | X | X | X | |||||
Traffic management | Reliable delivery times (off-peak), minimising delays and truck routes | X | X | ||||||
Time and access restrictions, low-emission zone | X | X | X | ||||||
Traffic control, efficiency of freight movements, reliable deliveries and minimising delays | X | X | X | X | |||||
Local truck routes, road network | X | X | X | ||||||
Pricing, incentives, and taxation | Freight incentives | X | X | X | |||||
Logistical management | Technology, ITS, satellite navigation system | X | X | X | X | ||||
Cargo consolidation | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
Freight demand and land use management | Integrating freight into land use planning process, review existing regulations | X | |||||||
Stakeholder engagement | Create a freight quality partnership - cooperation with stakeholders and municipalities | X | X | X | X | X | |||
Educate elected officials | X | ||||||||
Resolve conflicts with vulnerable road users | X | X |