Skip to main content

An Open Access Journal

Table 2 Summary of modal share changes (in percent) for existing Norwegian workplace relocation studies

From: Location, location, relocation: how the relocation of offices from suburbs to the inner city impacts commuting on foot and by bike

Direction of relocation

Year of relocation

Δ distance to city centre (km)

Name of workplace

Type of business

City

Walk modal share before

Δ walk modal share

Bicycle modal share before

Δ bicycle modal share

Public Transport modal share before

Δ Public Transport modal share

Method of data collection

Reference

To city centre

2013

−5.2

Gjensidige β

Insurance

Oslo

2

3

7

0

35

38

Before - After

[6]

To city centre

2000

−3.5

Statens Hus β

Public office

Trondheim

7

5

11

6

12

26

Before - After

[8, 9]

To city centre

1993

−2.5

IDG Norway a

Media, data, marketing

Oslo

4

3

4

3

25

18

After only

[29]

To city centre

2005

−2.0

Municipality of Trondheim β

Public office

Trondheim

7

5

18

11

15

14

Before - After

[7]

To city centre

1976

−1.5

Institute of Transport Economics

Research institute

Oslo

6

−1

n/a

n/a

33

19

Before - After

[26]

Net distance to city centre unchanged

2006

0

Centre for Interdisciplinary Environmental and Social Research (CIENS)

Research institute

Oslo

6

0

24

5

30

9

Before - After

[32]

To suburbs

2000

3.5

Oslo University Hospital a

Hospital

Oslo

14

−4

14

−4

53

−11

Before - After

[25]

To suburbs

1991

5.0

Gjensidige a

Insurance

Oslo

7

0

7

0

59

−18

Before - After

[23]

To suburbs

1985

7.6

Fokus Bank

Bank

Trondheim

13

−9

8

−6

30

−21

Similar bank in the same city block in lieu of before

[24]; [28]

To suburbs

1976

11.5

Tanum a

Bookstore

Oslo

7

−1

7

−1

79

−51

Before - After

[26]

To suburbs

1977

15.5

Atlas Copco a

Industrial sales

Oslo

3

3

3

3

22

−14

Before - After

[26]

To suburbs

1998

29.5

Oslo Airport a,b

Airport

Oslo

1

−1

1

−1

21

24

Before - After

[22]

  1. Notes β Post-2000 studies included for detailed comparison with the company relocation case study of Adresseavisen in Trondheim
  2. a Walking and cycling modal shares were presented as a combined value in the original reports, and have been approximated for this table by halving
  3. b Oslo airport relocated to an area with a purpose-built train station, which was not present in the before situation, thus explaining the increased public transport patronage despite decentralisation