Skip to main content

An Open Access Journal

Table 3 Share of haulage (of tkm) benefiting from the extra capacity by commodity group

From: Impacts of increasing maximum truck weight – case Finland

Commodity group with NST number

Vehicle type

Q4/2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Forestry

Forest raw material

53%

83%

86%

85%

91%

03 Mining and quarrying

Construction

13%

45%

42%

60%

64%

07 Coke and petroleum products

Tanker and bulk

0%

17%

39%

31%

61%

08 Chemical products

Tanker and bulk

13%

31%

56%

56%

51%

06 Wood products

Long-haul distribution

13%

36%

32%

43%

43%

14 Waste

Construction

3%

24%

22%

33%

39%

01 Agricultural products w/o forestry

Long-haul distribution

11%

22%

27%

22%

39%

09 Glass, other non-metallic mineral products

Long-haul distribution

13%

37%

33%

48%

38%

02 Coal

Tanker and bulk

 

100%

30%

39%

24%

04 Food products

Long-haul distribution

1%

9%

24%

17%

24%

10 Metal products

Long-haul distribution

9%

30%

19%

39%

22%

18 Grouped goods

Long-haul distribution

0%

10%

13%

18%

21%

11 Machinery and equipment

Part load

32%

1%

2%

2%

19%

15 Mail

Part load

0%

0%

0%

4%

8%

16 Empty containers, packaging

Part load

0%

0%

0%

0%

5%

17 Household and office removals

Part load

0%

0%

5%

37%

0%

19 Unidentifiable goods

Long-haul distribution

0%

0%

0%

26%

0%

12 Transport equipment

Part load

0%

1%

6%

2%

0%

05 Textiles

Part load

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

13 Furniture

Part load

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

20 Other goods and empty

 

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

ALL COMMODITIES

 

16%

35%

37%

43%

46%