Table 3 Sample characteristics (n = 995)

 Openness to using a combined mobility service for commuting

No

62.0%

Yes

38.0%

 Openness to using a combined mobility service for weekday leisure trips

No

52.6%

Yes

47.4%

 Openness to using a combined mobility service for weekend trips

No

46.1%

Yes

53.9%

 Policy and peer effects^a

Control

71.1%

4-star review (T1)

7.0%

5-star review (T2)

7.0%

No policy yet (T3)

7.4%

Policy decided (T4)

7.4%

 Age^c

Average (standard deviation)

48.65 (15.09)

 Age group^a

18–34 years

24%

35–54 years

40.8%

More than 55 years

35.2%

 Gender^b

Male

51.5%

Female

48.5%

 Education^a

Apprenticeship

32.7%

High school

13.5%

Higher education

53.8%

 Place of residence^b

City

50.9%

Agglomeration

28.3%

Countryside

20.8%

 Household income^b

Less than 3′000 CHF

4.1%

3′000–4′500 CHF

10.3%

4′501–6′000 CHF

18.9%

6′001–9′000 CHF

30.1%

9′001–12′000 CHF

21.9%

More than 12′000 CHF

14.7%

 Dominant mode choice: commuting^a

Private car

33.7%

Public transportation

42.1%

Soft mobility (bike, foot)

17.1%

Multimodal mobility

1.4%

Does not work

5.7%

 Dominant mode choice: leisure^a

Private car

47.5%

Public transportation

29.1%

Soft mobility (bike, foot)

20.1%

Multimodal mobility

3.3%

 Mobility sharing: car^a

Never

61.1%

Every few months

22.6%

Once a month

9.1%

One a week

4.4%

Several times a week

2.7%

 Type of public transport pass^b

GA travel card 1st class

4.3%

GA travel card 2nd class

19.4%

Regional pass

21.3%

None

55.0%

 Time used for commuting home-work (min)^b

Average (standard deviation)

29.26 (25.89)

 Time used for commuting home-leisure activity (min)^b

Average (standard deviation)

17.56 (20.62)

 Time used for commuting home-weekend trip (min)^b

Average (standard deviation)

50.59 (57.00)

 Importance of mobility service attributes (Mean (standard deviation) from Likert scale: 1, not at all important, to 5, extremely important)^c

Availability of all possible options

3.09 (1.31)

Cheap price

3.55 (1.16)

Intuitive and easy to use

3.76 (1.19)

Route with lowest CO₂ emissions

2.84 (1.24)

Find fastest possible route

3.52 (1.21)

Waiting time < 30 min

3.65 (1.26)

 Pro-environmental attitudes^a

Mean Likert scale (1, totally disagree to 5, totally agree) from 12 items

3.66 (0.75)

 Plans to reduce car usage^a

Likert scale (1, very unlikely, to 5, very likely)

2.58 (1.22)