Skip to main content

Table 6 Clusters in the sample

From: Conjoint analysis of mobility plans in the city of Dresden

  SC PMU ED CPTU sig.
Descriptive data      
amount abs.(%) 99 (30.8) 101 (31.5) 58 (18.1) 63 (19.6)  
age mean 32.0 31.6 39.1 31.9  
female share in % 22.2 44.6 36.2 38.1  
profession      
students 28.3 27.7 6.9 30.2  
employed 58.6 54.5 79.3 54.0  
area of living      
city center 19.2 15.8 10.3 19.0  
center sourroundings 67.7 67.3 51.7 61.9  
rural sourroundings 13.1 14.9 36.2 16.6  
Mobility behaviour      
car (driver or passenger) -0.243 0.177 1.200 -1.006 .000
bike 1.067 -0.543 -0.386 -0.451 .000
public transport -0.039 0.543 -1.409 0.488 .000
walking 0.248 0.106 -0.774 0.153 .000
Variables and Factors      
travel costs 0.095 0.394 -0.232 -0.567 .000
f1 - perceived importance of the car -0.130 0.480 0.713 -1.223 .000
f2 - time component of the journey 0.017 -0.291 0.380 0.089 .119
f3 - sustainability and efficient use of travel time 0.605 0.066 -0.695 -0.416 .000
f4 - practicability of the mode of transport -0.462 0.206 0.149 0.259 .000
  1. All results of the descriptive data are siginificant (Chi2 test) on a 0.05 level. Pairwise significant differences (p<0.01) in between the clusters in mobility behaviour, variables and factors are marked bold