Skip to main content

An Open Access Journal

Table 6 Clusters in the sample

From: Conjoint analysis of mobility plans in the city of Dresden

 

SC

PMU

ED

CPTU

sig.

Descriptive data

     

amount abs.(%)

99 (30.8)

101 (31.5)

58 (18.1)

63 (19.6)

 

age mean

32.0

31.6

39.1

31.9

 

female share in %

22.2

44.6

36.2

38.1

 

profession

     

students

28.3

27.7

6.9

30.2

 

employed

58.6

54.5

79.3

54.0

 

area of living

     

city center

19.2

15.8

10.3

19.0

 

center sourroundings

67.7

67.3

51.7

61.9

 

rural sourroundings

13.1

14.9

36.2

16.6

 

Mobility behaviour

     

car (driver or passenger)

-0.243

0.177

1.200

-1.006

.000

bike

1.067

-0.543

-0.386

-0.451

.000

public transport

-0.039

0.543

-1.409

0.488

.000

walking

0.248

0.106

-0.774

0.153

.000

Variables and Factors

     

travel costs

0.095

0.394

-0.232

-0.567

.000

f1 - perceived importance of the car

-0.130

0.480

0.713

-1.223

.000

f2 - time component of the journey

0.017

-0.291

0.380

0.089

.119

f3 - sustainability and efficient use of travel time

0.605

0.066

-0.695

-0.416

.000

f4 - practicability of the mode of transport

-0.462

0.206

0.149

0.259

.000

  1. All results of the descriptive data are siginificant (Chi2 test) on a 0.05 level. Pairwise significant differences (p<0.01) in between the clusters in mobility behaviour, variables and factors are marked bold