An Open Access Journal
From: Motives for walking and cycling when commuting – differences in local contexts and attitudes
Average marginal effects Pr (walkbike), predict dy/dx w.r.t. | Pooled sample | Metropolitan Stockholm | Mid-size Örebro | Mid-size Luleå | Small/rural Gislaved | Small/rural Arvidsjaur |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Female | −0.058 (0.035)* | −0.055 (0.062) | − 0.118 (0.087) | − 0.102 (0.084) | − 0.014 (0.073) | 0.073 (0.098) |
Age | −0.001 (0.001) | 0.000 (0.002) | − 0.001 (0.003) | − 0.006 (0.003)* | 0.002 (0.003) | 0.001 (0.003) |
Education | 0.028 (0.035) | 0.044 (0.062) | 0.032 (0.081) | −0.050 (0.077) | −0.077 (0.077) | 0.127 (0.096) |
Income | −0.017 (0.011) | 0.028 (0.017) | − 0.049 (0.157)** | −0.007 (0.026) | −0.069 (0.030)** | 0.016 (0.045) |
Distance | −0.030 (0.003)*** | −0.021 (0.005)*** | −0.037 (0.006)*** | −0.045 (0.008)*** | −0.027 (0.005)*** | −0.030 (0.013)** |
Infrastructure WB | 0.078 (0.037)** | 0.203 (0.063)*** | 0.107 (0.116) | −0.017 (0.092) | − 0.068 (0.074) | 0.161 (0.090)* |
Climate | 0.072 (0.034)** | 0.027 (0.067) | 0.017 (0.079) | 0.077 (0.074) | 0.133 (0.071)* | 0.137 (0.090) |
Health | 0.197 (0.032)*** | 0.240 (0.052)*** | 0.242 (0.079)*** | 0.149 (0.078)* | 0.103 (0.081) | 0.213 (0.081)*** |
Örebro | 0.082 (0.048)* | |||||
Luleå | 0.056 (0.047) | |||||
Gislaved | −0.055 (0.052) | |||||
Arvidsjaur | −0.055 (0.054) | |||||
Number of observations | 616 | 196 | 107 | 112 | 116 | 85 |