Skip to main content

An Open Access Journal

Table 5 Statistical result of information configuration types according to TTFs

From: Configuring user information by considering trust threatening factors associated with automated vehicles

TTF

Kruskal–Wallis result

Bonferroni post hoc result

1 [Lack of information]

H = 341.909,

DOF = 4,

p < 0.001

ICT

ICT1

ICT2

ICT3

ICT4

ICT5

  

ICT1

F = 186.926

p < 0.001*

F = 234.193

p < 0.001*

F = 367.225

p < 0.001*

F = 270.070

p < 0.001*

  

ICT2

p = 47.267

p = 0.024

F = 180.330

p < 0.001*

F = 83.144

p < 0.001*

  

ICT3

F = 133.063

p < 0.001*

F = 35.877

p = 0.098

  

ICT4

F = 97.185

p < 0.001*

  

ICT5

2 [Out of Control]

H = 96.133,

DOF = 4,

p < 0.001

ICT1

F = 33.630

p = 0.012

F = 89.433

p < 0.001*

F = 10.327

p = 0.430

F = 97.299

p < 0.001*

  

ICT2

F = 55.803

p < 0.001*

F = 23.303

p = 0.065

F = 63.669

p < 0.001*

  

ICT3

F = 79.106

p < 0.001*

F = 7.866

p = 0.538

  

ICT4

F = 86.972

p < 0.001*

  

ICT5

3 [Unpredictability]

H = 146.724,

DOF = 4,

p < 0.001

ICT1

F = 39.112

p = 0.004*

F = 141.141

p < 0.001*

F = 61.016

p < 0.001*

F = 112.117

p < 0.001*

  

ICT2

F = 102.029

p < 0.001*

F = 21.903

p = 0.083

F = 73.005

p < 0.001*

  

ICT3

F = 80.126

p < 0.001*

F = 29.024

p = 0.023

  

ICT4

F = 51.101

p < 0.001*

  

ICT5

4 [Value incongruence]

H = 80.845,

DOF = 4,

p < 0.001

ICT1

F = 31.791

p = 0.024

F = 97.631

p < 0.001*

F = 81.144

p < 0.001*

F = 105.546

p < 0.001*

  

ICT2

F = 65.840

p < 0.001*

F = 49.353

p < 0.001*

F = 73.756

p < 0.001*

  

ICT3

F = 16.487

p = 0.254

F = 7.916

p = 0.593

  

ICT4

F = 24.402

p = 0.090

  

ICT5

  1. *statistical significance