Table 5 Statistical result of information configuration types according to TTFs
| TTF | Kruskal–Wallis result | Bonferroni post hoc result | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 [Lack of information] |
H = 341.909, DOF = 4, p < 0.001 | ICT | ICT1 | ICT2 | ICT3 | ICT4 | ICT5 |
| ICT1 | – |
F = 186.926 p < 0.001* |
F = 234.193 p < 0.001* |
F = 367.225 p < 0.001* |
F = 270.070 p < 0.001* | ||
| ICT2 | – | – |
p = 47.267 p = 0.024 |
F = 180.330 p < 0.001* |
F = 83.144 p < 0.001* | ||
| ICT3 | – | – | – |
F = 133.063 p < 0.001* |
F = 35.877 p = 0.098 | ||
| ICT4 | – | – | – | – |
F = 97.185 p < 0.001* | ||
| ICT5 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| 2 [Out of Control] |
H = 96.133, DOF = 4, p < 0.001 | ICT1 | – |
F = 33.630 p = 0.012 |
F = 89.433 p < 0.001* |
F = 10.327 p = 0.430 |
F = 97.299 p < 0.001* |
| ICT2 | – | – |
F = 55.803 p < 0.001* |
F = 23.303 p = 0.065 |
F = 63.669 p < 0.001* | ||
| ICT3 | – | – | – |
F = 79.106 p < 0.001* |
F = 7.866 p = 0.538 | ||
| ICT4 | – | – | – | – |
F = 86.972 p < 0.001* | ||
| ICT5 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| 3 [Unpredictability] |
H = 146.724, DOF = 4, p < 0.001 | ICT1 | – |
F = 39.112 p = 0.004* |
F = 141.141 p < 0.001* |
F = 61.016 p < 0.001* |
F = 112.117 p < 0.001* |
| ICT2 | – | – |
F = 102.029 p < 0.001* |
F = 21.903 p = 0.083 |
F = 73.005 p < 0.001* | ||
| ICT3 | – | – | – |
F = 80.126 p < 0.001* |
F = 29.024 p = 0.023 | ||
| ICT4 | – | – | – | – |
F = 51.101 p < 0.001* | ||
| ICT5 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| 4 [Value incongruence] |
H = 80.845, DOF = 4, p < 0.001 | ICT1 | – |
F = 31.791 p = 0.024 |
F = 97.631 p < 0.001* |
F = 81.144 p < 0.001* |
F = 105.546 p < 0.001* |
| ICT2 | – | – |
F = 65.840 p < 0.001* |
F = 49.353 p < 0.001* |
F = 73.756 p < 0.001* | ||
| ICT3 | – | – | – |
F = 16.487 p = 0.254 |
F = 7.916 p = 0.593 | ||
| ICT4 | – | – | – | – |
F = 24.402 p = 0.090 | ||
| ICT5 | – | – | – | – | – | ||