Skip to main content

Table 5 Statistical result of information configuration types according to TTFs

From: Configuring user information by considering trust threatening factors associated with automated vehicles

TTF Kruskal–Wallis result Bonferroni post hoc result
1 [Lack of information] H = 341.909,
DOF = 4,
p < 0.001
ICT ICT1 ICT2 ICT3 ICT4 ICT5
   ICT1 F = 186.926
p < 0.001*
F = 234.193
p < 0.001*
F = 367.225
p < 0.001*
F = 270.070
p < 0.001*
   ICT2 p = 47.267
p = 0.024
F = 180.330
p < 0.001*
F = 83.144
p < 0.001*
   ICT3 F = 133.063
p < 0.001*
F = 35.877
p = 0.098
   ICT4 F = 97.185
p < 0.001*
   ICT5
2 [Out of Control] H = 96.133,
DOF = 4,
p < 0.001
ICT1 F = 33.630
p = 0.012
F = 89.433
p < 0.001*
F = 10.327
p = 0.430
F = 97.299
p < 0.001*
   ICT2 F = 55.803
p < 0.001*
F = 23.303
p = 0.065
F = 63.669
p < 0.001*
   ICT3 F = 79.106
p < 0.001*
F = 7.866
p = 0.538
   ICT4 F = 86.972
p < 0.001*
   ICT5
3 [Unpredictability] H = 146.724,
DOF = 4,
p < 0.001
ICT1 F = 39.112
p = 0.004*
F = 141.141
p < 0.001*
F = 61.016
p < 0.001*
F = 112.117
p < 0.001*
   ICT2 F = 102.029
p < 0.001*
F = 21.903
p = 0.083
F = 73.005
p < 0.001*
   ICT3 F = 80.126
p < 0.001*
F = 29.024
p = 0.023
   ICT4 F = 51.101
p < 0.001*
   ICT5
4 [Value incongruence] H = 80.845,
DOF = 4,
p < 0.001
ICT1 F = 31.791
p = 0.024
F = 97.631
p < 0.001*
F = 81.144
p < 0.001*
F = 105.546
p < 0.001*
   ICT2 F = 65.840
p < 0.001*
F = 49.353
p < 0.001*
F = 73.756
p < 0.001*
   ICT3 F = 16.487
p = 0.254
F = 7.916
p = 0.593
   ICT4 F = 24.402
p = 0.090
   ICT5
  1. *statistical significance