Skip to main content

An Open Access Journal

Table 1 Exhaustive case discrimination of 2 × 18 possible transitions

From: Sustainable development assessment of incentive-driven shared on-demand mobility systems in rural settings

Scenario

Regulatory Option I

Regulatory Option II

Final choice set \(\mathbf{\overline{\mathrm{C}}}\)

(Solo) Car

\(\mathbf{\overline{1 }}\)

FITS—public Tpt

(Solo) Car

\(\mathbf{\overline{1 }}\)

FRS

\(\mathbf{\overline{2 }}\)

On-demand

\(\mathbf{3,4,5}\)

Initial choice set \(\mathbf{\mathrm{C}}=\textbf{m}\)

 

FRS

\(\mathbf{overline{2 }}\)

On_Demand

\(2\mathbf{\mathrm{A }}\bigvee 2\mathbf{\mathrm{B}}\bigvee 2\mathbf{\mathrm{C}}\)

   

(a) Elective user, PT available \(\left\{1, 2\right\}\)

\(m\)* = 1 chosen

12a-I-1

12a-I-2

12a-I-2A \(\bigvee\)

12a-I-2B \(\bigvee\)

12a-I-2C

12a-II-1

12a-II-2

12a-II-3

12a-II-4

12a-II-5

(b) \(m\)* = 2 chosen

12b-I-1

12b-I-2

12b-I-2A \(\vee\)

12b-I-2B \(\vee\)

12b-I-2C

12b-II-1

12b-II-2

12b-II-3

12b-II-4

12b-II-5

Elective user, PT unavailable \(\sigma_{{\mathbf{L}}} = 0\) &

\(\vartheta_{1} \%\) Car Captive \(\left\{ 1 \right\}\)

1-I-1

–

1-I-2A \(\vee\)

1-I-2B \(\vee\)

1-I-2C

1-II-1

–

1-II-3

1-II-4

1-II-5

\(\vartheta_{2}\)% PT Captive/Car unavailable \(\left\{ 2 \right\}\)

–

2-I-2

2-I-2A \(\vee\)

2-I-2B \(\vee\)

2-I-2C

–

2-II-2

2-II-3

2-II-4

2-II-5