An Open Access Journal
Regulatory option | Option I | Option II | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Territorial type (trip origin) | 6 Medium-sized towns | 7 Small towns and villages | 6 Medium-sized towns | 7 Small towns and villages |
Share of potential demand i.e.,\(\left( {1 - \vartheta_{1} - \vartheta_{2} } \right) \cdot \left( {1 - \vartheta_{3} } \right)\) | 33% | 32% | 33% | 32% |
Elective demand trip count | 51,900 | 94,400 | 51,900 | 94,400 |
Option I only: residual as of Eq. (3), eligible for DRT | 4,700 | 36,800 |  |  |
Equivalent #Rides (\(\tilde{\pi } = 1.2\)) | 3,900 | 30,700 | 43,250 | 87,700 |
Requested avg. trip length | 8Â km | 13Â km | 8Â km | 13Â km |
Internal car trips originating | 50,200 | 158,500 | 50,200 | 158,500 |
Car trips eligible for DRT | 10,500 | 55,500 | 50,200 | 158,500 |
% Eligible for subsidy | 100% | 100% | 21% | 35% |
Rides supplied at \(\propto = 0.8\%\)  ↔ (\(r_{0} /c_{O}\), \(r_{1} /c_{O}\) and \(\delta\)) Compensation k€ (subsidy) total detour vehicle km | 84 (2, 0.5, 1.1) 0.18 (100%) 134 | 440 (1, 0.5, 1.1) 2.2 (100%) 580 | 600 (2, 0.5, 1.05) 0,8 (21%) 160 | 1300 (1, 0.5, 1.05) 3.0 (35%) 824 |
Rides supplied at \(\propto = 1.7\%\)  ↔ (\(r_{0} /c_{O}\), \(r_{1} /c_{O}\) and \(\delta\)) Compensation k€ (Subsidy) Total detour vehicle km | 180 (2, 0.7, 1.2) 0.5 (100%) 378 | 940 (1, 0.7, 1.2) 3.3 (100%) 2,450 | 1,200 (2, 0.7, 1.1) 3.2 (3.4%) 680 | 2,700 (1, 0.7, 1.1) 9.5 (12.3%) 3,500 |
Rides supplied \(\propto\) at equilibrium (\(\propto_{0}\))  ↔ (\(r_{0} /c_{O}\), \(r_{1} /c_{O}\) and \(\delta\)) Compensation k€ (subsidy) Total detour vehicle km €/Pkm for \(\tilde{\pi }^{^{\prime}} = 2\) | 790 7.4% (0.20) (4, 1.6, 1.4) 4.6 (52%) 3,100 0.19 | 4.500 8.2% (0.15) (4, 1.4, 1.35) 35.8 (41%) 20,700 0.12 | 2.800 3.9% (0.15) (4, 1.4, 1.25) 10.5 (9.9%) 3,900 0.16 | 8.700 5.5% (0.15) (4, 1.2, 1.2) 60,1 (12%) 11,300 0.09 |