Skip to main content

Table 5 Results of multiple country comparisons (post hoc Scheffé tests)

From: EU DRUID project: results of a questionnaire survey amongst participants of driver rehabilitation programmes in Europe

Variable Multiple comparison results; Countries with sign. differences p ≤ .001 (mean Diff) Countries forming homogenous subgroups (alpha = .05) in ascending order
I II III IV V
Overall course evaluation GB-A (−.19) GB-B (−.30) GB-D (−.37) GB-F (−.21) GB-H (−.38) GB-I (−.49) GB PL, A, F, B F, B, D B, D, H D, H, I, NL
GB-NL (−.50) A-D (−.18) A-H (−.19) A-I (−.30) A-NL (−.31) PL-D (−.19)
PL-I (−.31) PL-NL (−.32) F-D (−.16) F-H (−.17) F-I (−.28)  
Transtheoretical model—processes
Consciousness raising GB-A (−.24) GB-D (−.22) GB-F (−.30) GB-H (−.44) GB-I (−.37) GB-NL (−.24) GB, PL PL, D, NL, A, B, F D, NL, A., B, F, I B, F, I, H  
H-A (.20) H-D (.21) H-PL (.30) H-NL (.20)   
Dramatic relief NL-A (.44) NL-D (.52) NL-F (.30) NL-GB (.42) NL-H (.29) NL-I (.55) I, D, A, GB, F D, A, GB, F, H A, GB, F, H, B, PL B, PL, NL  
D-F (−.22) D-H (−.23) D-PL (−.30)   
Environmental re-evaluation PL-A (−.40) PL-B (−.64) PL-D (−.35) PL-H (−.41) PL-NL (−.53)   PL, F, GB F, GB, I, D, A, H I, D, A, H, NL D, A, H, NL, B  
Self re-evaluation GB-A (−.22) GB-D (−.18) GB-F (−.24) GB-H (−.21)    PL, GB, B, D, H, NL, A GB, B, D, H, NL, A, F B, D, H, NL, A, F, I   
Social liberation a GB, A, D, B, H, PL, NL, F D, B, H, PL, NL, F, I    
Cognitive–affective process scales (in sum) GB-A (−.16) GB-D (−.14) GB-F (−.20) GB-H (−.27) GB-I (−.23) GB-NL (−.26) GB, PL, D PL, D, A, F, B D, A, F, B I, NL, H   
H-A (.12) H-D (.14) H-PL (.19) D-NL (−.12)   
Self liberation GB-A (−.17) GB-D (−.22) GB-F (−.23) GB-H (−.24) GB-I (−.36) GB-NL (−.18) GB, PL, A PL, A, NL, B, D, F A, NL, B, D, F, H B, D, F, H, I  
I-PL (.31)      
Stimulus control GB-A (−.19) GB-D (−.19) GB-F (−.24)     PL, GB, H, NL, D, A H, NL, D, A, F, I NL, D, A, F, I, B   
Counter conditioning GB-A (−.22) GB-D (−.27) GB-F (−.30) GB-H (−.27) GB-I (−.38)   GB, PL, NL PL, NL, A, B, D, H NL, A, B, D, H, F, I   
Helping relationships I-A (.32) I-D (.33) I-GB (.42) I-PL (.39) H-D (.16) H-GB (.25) GB, PL, D, A, F, B, NL D, A, F, B, NL, H H, I   
Reinforcement management NL-A (.31) NL-D (.30) NL-GB (.40) NL-H (.33) NL-PL (.54) B-PL (.56) PL, GB, I, H, A, D GB, I, H, A, D, F F, NL, B   
Behavioral process scales (in sum) GB-A (−.16) GB-B (−.26) GB-D (−.18) GB-F (−.21) GB-H (−.20) GB-I (−.32) GB, PL PL, A A, D, H, NL, F, B D, H, NL, F, B, I  
GB-NL (−.20) PL-F (−.19) PL-I (−.30)     
Diamond of change—contributing factors
Individual GB-A (−.19) GB-B (−.30) GB-D (−.18) GB-F (−.23) GB-H (−.27) GB-I (−.30) GB, PL PL, D D, A, F, NL, H, I, B   
GB-NL (−.25) PL-F (−.20) PL-H (−.25) PL-NL (−.22)   
Methods GB-A (−.31) GB-D (−.36) GB-F (−.28) GB-H (−.44) GB-I (−.37) GB-NL (−.32) GB, PL PL, F F, A, NL, B, D, I, H   
PL-D (−30) PL-H (−.38)     
Contents GB-F (−.17) GB-NL (−.23)      GB, PL, D, I, A, H, B, F PL, D, I A, H, B, F, NL    
Participant–participant relations GB-H (−.21)       GB, B, D, A, NL, F, H, PL D, A, NL, F, H, PL, I    
Participant–trainer relations GB-D (−.15) GB-H (−.23) GB-I (−.41) I-A (.34) I-D (.27) I-F (−.31) GB, A, PL, F, NL, D A, PL, F, NL, D, B, H    
I-PL (.31) I-NL (.28) A-H (−.16)    
  1. aThe highest p-value was p = .002 for country comparisons