An Open Access Journal
From: Toward an urban transport sustainability index: an European comparison
Policy/City | Stockholm | København | Paris | Oslo | Amsterdam | Manchester | Helsinki | London | Lisboa | Berlin | Madrid | Brussels | Bologna | Rome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Urban planning & transport | ||||||||||||||
Control of urban sprawl | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |  | √ |  |  |
Integration of public transport planning | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Rules limiting the construction of parking place |  | √ |  |  | √ | √ | √ |  | √ |  |  | √ |  |  |
Transport demand management | ||||||||||||||
Parking regulation e restrictions | √ | √ | √ |  | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |  | √ | √ | √ | √ |
City centre access control | √ | √ |  |  | √ |  |  | √ | √ |  | √ |  | √ | √ |
Pedestrian areas and low traffic zones |  | √ |  |  | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Urban toll | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |  | √ | √ |  | √ |  | √ | √ |
Development of public transport | ||||||||||||||
Investment in public transport | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Extension of reserved routes and public transport priority schemes | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |  |
Improvement of service quality | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Attractive price scale | √ | √ | √ | √ |  | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Organization and integration | ||||||||||||||
Public transport organization | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Network integration (information, fares…) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
NTSI | 1 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.65 |