Skip to main content

An Open Access Journal

Table 6 Statistical result of information configuration methods according to TTFs

From: Configuring user information by considering trust threatening factors associated with automated vehicles

TTF

Kruskal–Wallis result

Bonferroni post hoc result

1 [Lack of information]

H = 240.456,

DOF = 2,

p < 0.001

ICM

ICM1

ICM2

ICM3

  

ICM1

F = 29.507,

p = 0.025

F = 154.858,

p < 0.001*

  

ICM2

F = 184.365,

p < 0.001*

  

ICM3

2 [Out of Control]

H = 76.418,

DOF = 2,

p < 0.001

ICM1

F = 8.081,

p = 0.280

F = 64.183,

p < 0.001*

  

ICM2

F = 56.102,

p < 0.001*

  

ICM3

-

3 [Unpredictability]

H = 80.723,

DOF = 2,

p < 0.001

ICM1

F = 15.054,

p = 0.042

F = 67.793,

p < 0.001*

  

ICM2

F = 52.739,

p < 0.001*

  

ICM3

4 [Value incongruence]

H = 133.758,

DOF = 2,

p < 0.001

ICM1

F = 47.935,

p < 0.001

F = 100.435,

p < 0.001*

  

ICM2

F = 52.5,

p < 0.001*

  

ICM3

  1. *statistical significance