Skip to main content

Table 6 Statistical result of information configuration methods according to TTFs

From: Configuring user information by considering trust threatening factors associated with automated vehicles

TTF Kruskal–Wallis result Bonferroni post hoc result
1 [Lack of information] H = 240.456,
DOF = 2,
p < 0.001
ICM ICM1 ICM2 ICM3
   ICM1 F = 29.507,
p = 0.025
F = 154.858,
p < 0.001*
   ICM2 F = 184.365,
p < 0.001*
   ICM3
2 [Out of Control] H = 76.418,
DOF = 2,
p < 0.001
ICM1 F = 8.081,
p = 0.280
F = 64.183,
p < 0.001*
   ICM2 F = 56.102,
p < 0.001*
   ICM3 -
3 [Unpredictability] H = 80.723,
DOF = 2,
p < 0.001
ICM1 F = 15.054,
p = 0.042
F = 67.793,
p < 0.001*
   ICM2 F = 52.739,
p < 0.001*
   ICM3
4 [Value incongruence] H = 133.758,
DOF = 2,
p < 0.001
ICM1 F = 47.935,
p < 0.001
F = 100.435,
p < 0.001*
   ICM2 F = 52.5,
p < 0.001*
   ICM3
  1. *statistical significance