An Open Access Journal
From: Land use of energy supply for carbon neutral mobility: a well-to-wheel analysis
 | Land use per unit of captured CO2 or energy | Sources | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
DAC | 1.5 (0.04-25) km2/Mt CO2 per year | Due to the large spread in the literature, a value in the middle, as reported by [36], is used for the calculations. | |
Carbon capture at point sources (post-combustion) | 13,000 m2/Mt CO2 per year | [23] | Questionable whether this space is available at industrial facilities. |
FT-synfuel production | 0.03 m2/ GJ synfuel per year | [37] | Based on the Yinchuan FT-plant, which runs on coal. |
Methanol production | 0.06 m2/GJ synfuel per year | [38] | Based on demonstration plant in Iceland that produces 4 kt methanol on a surface of approximately 5,000 m2. |
Ammonia production (including N2 production) | <0.04 m2/GJ synfuel per year | [39] | Based on an industrial complex where among others ammonia is produced. As the entire surface of the complex is used, the surface is an upper limit. |
Ammonia storage | 8*10−5–5*10−3 m2/GJ synfuel per year | Large economies of scale | |
Ammonia transport and tank infrastructure | No land use is assigned to these components. Probably diesel infrastructure could be used after adaptations. Land use will increase due to lower energy density and larger safety distances 42. | Â | Â |
FT storage, transport and tank infrastructure | No land use is assigned to these components. Similar to current diesel infrastructure. | Â | Â |
Methanol storage, transport and tank infrastructure | No land use is assigned to these components. Probably diesel infrastructure could be used after adaptations 43. Land use will increase due to lower energy density. | Â | Â |