An Open Access Journal
From: Representations of urban cycling in sustainability transitions research: a review
Authors and publication year | Study title | Aims | Objectives | Emphasized actors (Who) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cycling Objects (What) | ||||
E-bikes | ||||
[19] | Shifting gears on sustainable transport transitions: Stakeholder perspectives on e-bikes in Toronto, Canada | Explore how governance actors in the transport system perceive e-bikes | - Explore how governance stakeholders see the role of e-bikes in sustainability transitions - Explore their role in uptake or rejection of the technology | Transportation governance actors (”strategic policy development, regulation, enforcement and infrastructure management in the City of Toronto, Canada”) pp.199–200 |
[39] | Benign mobility? Electric bicycles, sustainable transport consumption behaviour and socio-technical transitions in Nanjing, China | Analyze the role of e-bike use in the urban transport system of Nanjing | Analyse”attitudes and characteristics” (p.224) of residents towards e-bike use | (Potential) users and other mode users directly addressed through survey |
[40] | The death of a transport regime? The future of electric bicycles and transportation pathways for sustainable mobility in China | - Describe the future development of e-bikes in China - Apply the MLP to transport systems | - Identify factors that will influence the further adoption of e-bikes - Analyse how e-bikes compare to other modes of transport - Predict whether e-bikes will consolidate their role in the transport system, or not | (Potential) users and other mode users directly addressed through survey |
[73] | Spontaneous emergence versus technology management in sustainable mobility transitions: Electric bicycles in China | Explore reasons and mechanisms behind the rise of e-bikes in China | - Analyze why e-bike emerged in absence of active policy support in China - Multi-scalar MLP application to explain change processes in the e-bike market | Market and policy-actors |
Bikeshare systems (BSS) | ||||
[53] | Towards inclusive transport landscapes: Re-visualizing a Bicycle Sharing Scheme in Santiago Metropolitan Region | - Analyze the implications of introducing a BSS in its social and institutional dimensions - Introduce a new tool for managing BSS in a Global South context | Combining the MLP with alluvial diagrams and circular dendrograms to inform planning and operation of BSS | - Focus on local authorities (comunas), but also public and private transport planners and policy-makers - Undifferentiated users that provide data for improving services (BSS-users compared to other public space users) |
[63] | The Governance Challenge within Socio-Technical Transition Processes: Public Bicycles and Smartphone-Based Bicycles in Guangzhou, China | Analyse how technological transport innovations affect modes of urban governance | Explore the effects of change from public bikes to technology- enhanced sharing systems had on mobility governance in Guangzhu, China | o |
[60] | Bicycle Policy in Mexico City: Urban Experiments and Differentiated Citizenship | Examine how bicycle policy (sustainable transport innovation) affects urban citizenship unequally in different parts of Mexico City | Apply a”Cities and Low carbon Transitions framework” [21] to evaluate and conceptualize transport as a socio-technical system - Introduce urban citizenship concepts to emphasize how cycling infrastructure affects inequality [33] | Policy-actors: BSS-firms, urban administrators, NGOs and advocates |
[61] | Social enterprise as catalyst of transformation in the micro-mobility sector | - Introduce social entrepreneurship to sustainability transitions research - How social enterprises as innovations interact with the existing socio-technical transport regime | Describe how a local University bikeshare scheme grew to become the first established bikeshare operator in Manila | Social entrepreneurs, volunteer community around it and advocacies |
[57] | Policy, users and discourses: Examples from bikeshare programs in (Kolkata) India and (Manila) Philippines | Examine how cycling transitions play out in Manila and Kalkota with a focus on bikeshare schemes (PEDL, Kolkata & UPBS, Manila) | Investigate the dynamics in changing administrative regulations and the role of bikeshare users through a novel transitions framework focusing on administrative and socio-institutional practices mediated by user roles and discourses (political, cultural and smart) | Based on (Schot et al., 2016) users are: - producer of new practices, legitimators of visions and aspirations - intermediaries shaping and (re-)aligning systems’ elements - citizens becoming active in challenging existing regimes, while nurturing and protecting the niche, and - consumers who purchase the cycling service |
[18] | The Dynamics of Public Participation in New Technology Transitions: The Case of Dockless Bicycle Hire in Manchester | Examine how and why an innovation (local BSS) failed in Manchester | Understand the political and public implications of a niche innovation | Local public authorities, bikeshare provider, the public as end-users, particularly young people |
[45] | Dockless bikeshare in Amsterdam: a mobility justice perspective on niche framing struggles | Analyse bikeshare actors attempts towards legitimization | Integration of mobility justice and socio-technical transitions concepts | Bikeshare providers, researchers supporting sharing economy (niche) city government, conventional BSS providers, NGOs, researchers wary of the sharing economy, organized residents |
[66] | Ripples through the city: Understanding the processes set in motion through embedding a public bike sharing scheme in a city | Explore the effects of introducing a public bikeshare scheme (dublinbikes) to an urban system | Apply a MLP to map the existing socio-technical transport system and the disruptive and reconfiguring effects of the bikeshare scheme after break-through | Cycling advocacies, users |
[67] | Business model innovation and socio-technical transitions. A new prospective framework with an application to bike sharing | Develop a prospective transition framework | Investigate potential for various bikeshare providers’ business models to grow (scale) based on increasing returns, industry structure around the innovation and the institutional context | bikeshare providers, industry and public institutions |
Measures addressing cycling (How) | ||||
Infrastructural interventions | ||||
[22] | Encountering bikelash: Experiences and lessons from New Zealand communities | To investigate organized, community-level, opposition to bike lanes (bikelash) | - What are the motivations for bikelash? - What are the experiences of supporters (e.g., local council and transport agency planners) and opponents (e.g., conservative community members and local retailers)? - What are the responses to bikelash? | Supporters and opponents of bicycle infrastructure |
[68] | White line fever: a sociotechnical perspective on the contested implementation of an urban bike lane network | Develop a ST-systems perspective to capture dynamics of social and technical elements | - Investigate how the bike networked developed after implementation - Explore how bike lane implementation affected the urban transport system | o |
Policy and planning (innovation) | ||||
[8] | The challenge of the bicycle street: Applying collaborative governance processes while protecting user centred innovations | Explore how collaborative governance affects SNMP exemplified through the bicycle street as a policy innovation | - Describe how bicycle streets originated and developed in Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands to protect cycling practices - describe challenges of collaborative governance and protecting practices through a case of a bicycle street in Eindhoven | o |
[44] | The legal street: a scarcity approach to urban open space in mobility transitions | Identify and compare spatial allocation and appropriation by bicycles and cars and how they affect sustainable mobility transitions | - Identify regulations for space allocations - Identify practices for appropriating space - Explore the implications on mobility transitions | o |
[36] | Reinventing the bicycle: how calculative practices shape urban environmental governance | Explore how novel knowledge-producing practices affect how cycling is known, made visible and governed | Analyse how calculative devices (a form of epistemic practice, such as accident statistics, or cost–benefit analysis) were used to understand and act upon cycling in Copenhagen since the 1900s | Urban planners as main users of calculative devices |
[28] | Urban transport transitions: Copenhagen, City of Cyclists | Derive insights from Copenhagen’s bicycle strategy by assessing in which aspects it has worked (success), where it didn’t work (limitations), and the reproducibility of the strategy | Investigate the role of market-based, soft policy and command-and-control measures since the 2000s to advance cycling in Copenhagen | o |
Comprehensive systems perspective | ||||
[58] | Policy learning and sustainable urban transitions: Mobilising Berlin’s cycling renaissance | Explore a proposed learning relationship on cycling policy | - Multi-actor analysis to understand the role of policy in Berlin’s cycling increase - Analysis of Manchester’s policies and interviews with planning and policy actors to understand the adoption of Berlin’s model | o |
[4] | Hot or not? The role of cycling in ASEAN megacities: Case studies of Bangkok and Manila | Apply TIS-approach to cycling | - Describe cycling in Bangkok and Manila (status-quo and advances) - Describe necessary steps to develop cycling’s role in the transport systems - test TIS-framework on sustainable transport | Policy-makers (as this is the take-away of the TIS-framework |
[13] | A socio-technical transition framework for introducing cycling in developing megacities: The case of Istanbul | Introduce a framework to facilitate transitions towards cycling in developing Megacities where cycling is marginalized | - Apply the MLP to Istanbul’s ST-transport system around cycling - Suggest pathways for cycling transitions in Istanbul | (potential) cyclists and”experts” (urban or transport planners, engineers and public administrators |
[56] | Cycling the city, re-imagining the city: Envisioning urban sustainability transitions in Thailand | Demonstrating the relevance of’urban imaginaries’ envisioned by’change agents’ to prefigure the context of urban sustainability transitions | Describe how urban imaginaries emerge, gain substance, are communicated and mobilized | Cycling campaigners |
[16] | Getting Londoners on two wheels: A comparative approach analysing London’s potential pathways to cycling transitions | Identify pathways and barriers to upscaling of London’s cycling niche | Compare historical cycling transitions in Amsterdam with the current status of cycling in London | Policy-makers, advocacies and cyclists |
[12] | Bicycle commuting in an automobile‑dominated city: how individuals become and remain bike commuters in Charlotte, North Carolina | To better understand how bike commuting is adopted and maintained | Elicit bike commuting practices in Charlotte based on commuters' first-hand accounts | Experienced and novice cyclists, officials, planners and employers |