Skip to main content

An Open Access Journal

Table 1 Percentages of activity states and transition modes distribution across main factors such as gender, age group, year, and residential area (See Fig. 1, Barcelona city, Primary Crown and Rest of the Barcelona Metropolitan region). From 5:00 to 24:00 h using the EMEF 2018 to 2020

From: The role of life course and gender in mobility patterns: a spatiotemporal sequence analysis in Barcelona

Gender

Activity states and transition modes

A

Escort (%)

C

Casual (%)

H

Home (%)

O

Other (%)

S

School (%)

TC

Private Tr (%)

TM

Other Tr.mode (%)

TP

Public Tr. (%)

TW

Active modes (%)

W

Work (%)

Male

1.0

1.9

62.6

4.9

2.5

3.0

0.2

1.4

2.2

20.2

Female

1.3

2.3

68.1

4.6

2.4

2.0

0.1

1.8

2.2

15.2

Age group

Activity states and transition modes

A (%)

C (%)

H (%)

O (%)

S (%)

TC (%)

TM (%)

TP (%)

TW (%)

W (%)

16–29

0.3

2.3

60.1

5.4

12.2

1.9

0.1

3.2

1.6

12.9

30–44

1.7

1.6

58.2

3.8

0.6

3.2

0.2

1.5

1.9

27.4

45–64

1.1

2.0

62.8

4.4

0.3

2.9

0.1

1.4

2.1

22.9

65 + 

1.2

2.9

82.9

6.1

0.2

1.4

0.1

0.9

3.5

0.9

Year

Activity states and transition modes

A (%)

C (%)

H (%)

O (%)

S (%)

TC (%)

TM (%)

TP (%)

TW (%)

W (%)

2018

1.0

2.7

61.7

5.1

2.8

2.9

0.0

2.0

2.1

19.6

2019

1.5

2.1

60.8

5.9

3.0

2.8

0.1

1.9

2.4

19.5

2020

0.9

1.6

73.5

3.5

1.5

1.8

0.2

0.9

2.2

13.8

Residential area

Activity states and transition modes

A (%)

C (%)

H (%)

O (%)

S (%)

TC (%)

TM (%)

TP (%)

TW (%)

W (%)

Barcelona

1.2

2.7

61.9

5.8

2.8

1.5

0.1

2.8

2.9

18.4

Primary

1.4

2.4

63.8

4.6

2.5

2.2

0.1

2.0

2.5

18.4

Rest

1.3

2.0

63.3

4.5

2.8

3.1

0.1

1.4

2.2

19.1