An Open Access Journal
Table 9 Technology-related characteristics of the ‘traveller profiles’
From: Assessing the intention to uptake MaaS: the case of Randstad
Cluster (CL) | CL1 | CL2 | CL3 | CL4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Traveller profile | Short-duration commuters | Active travellers | Traditional car-supporters | MaaS admires |
Technology-related characteristics (%) | N = 119 | N = 123 | N = 106 | N = 70 |
Smartphone availability * | ||||
Yes | 93.3 | 93.7 | 93.4 | 100 |
Kruskal–Wallis not significant | ||||
Use of travel-planning applications*** | ||||
Never | 1.7 | 5.7 | 9.4 | 0.0 |
Almost never | 8.4 | 5.7 | 12.3 | 2.9 |
Sometimes | 21.8 | 35.2 | 36.8 | 2.9 |
Frequently | 49.6 | 38.4 | 34.0 | 58.8 |
Always | 18.5 | 15.1 | 7.5 | 35.3 |
Kruskal–Wallis significant (p < 0.01) | ||||
Type of information demanded*** | ||||
Mode of transport: M(SD) 1 | 3.66 (0.978) | 3.55 (0.919) | 3.32 (1.065) | 4.44 (0.660) |
Incidences | 3.82 (0.965) | 3.69 (0.927) | 3.40 (0.912) | 4.24 (0.819) |
Accessibility | 2.84 (1.157) | 2.74 (1.104) | 2.68 (1.056) | 4.38 (0.739) |
Parking at destination | 3.39 (1.144) | 2.94 (1.187) | 3.08 (1.006) | 4.50 (0.615) |
Environmental impact | 2.73 (1.039) | 2.81 (1.046) | 2.64 (0.968) | 4.21 (0.729) |
Physical activity | 2.78 (1.158) | 2.92 (1.090) | 2.48 (1.035) | 4.15 (0.821) |